International Trade and Competitiveness
Paper and wood products exports account for about 15 percent of the industry’s annual total sales. In 2015, the industry’s global exports totaled about $30.3 billion, of which $8.9 billion were exports of wood products and $21.4 billion were exports of pulp, paper and packaging. We estimate that our industry’s exports support approximately 135,000 jobs at pulp, paper and wood products mills and related logging operations in the U.S., as well as many more jobs in communities where these facilities are located. More than 75 percent of U.S. pulp and paper mills are located in counties designated by the Census Bureau as more than 80 percent rural.
AF&PA supports trade policies that advance our industry’s strong global market position. In an increasingly globalized market, it is critical for the U.S. paper and wood products manufacturing industry to achieve unrestricted access to international markets and level the playing field among international competitors by eliminating both tariff and non-tariff barriers. The U.S. already provides tariff-free access for paper and paperboard while import tariffs on wood products are relatively low. Our industry’s largest export markets for pulp, paper and paperboard are East Asia (26.3 percent of U.S. exports), Canada (25.2 percent), Mexico (19.7 percent) and Europe (14.4 percent).
Open markets have helped spread the benefits of innovation and created economic opportunities for many; however, innovations may also bring market disruption and we support an increased national focus on educating and training current and future workers to ensure U.S. economic vitality in the 21st century.
Enforcing Existing Trade Laws
U.S. and international trade laws are in place to ensure a level playing field among global competitors and that mechanisms for dispute resolution are transparent and rules-based. We support enforcement of existing U.S. trade laws and believe that “injured” industries and workers should have access to appropriate remedies.
AF&PA supports trade agreements designed to generate substantive economic benefits for U.S. forest products companies and their workers. This includes indirect exports that result from increased domestic sales in the U.S. in other sectors that would benefit from increased exports (e.g., packaging).
Trade agreements offer opportunities for achieving the industry’s trade and competitiveness objectives. During the past decade, many countries have negotiated bilateral and multilateral trade agreements to provide access for their producers in export markets. U.S. producers of goods and services risk falling behind without an aggressive effort of foreign market opening. We support the negotiation of trade agreements that result in commercial benefits for American companies not only by reducing tariffs and traditional non-tariff barriers, but also that provide for new rules and stronger disciplines in areas such as customs administration, intellectual property protection, the role of state owned enterprises, and greater transparency and access to the standards development process of trading partners to ensure non-discriminatory treatment of U.S. goods. We also seek strong language to eliminate illegal logging globally.
AF&PA supports the elimination of market-distorting subsidies and other financial support provided by foreign governments for new manufacturing, for existing unsustainable manufacturing capacity and for wood fiber used in the manufacture of forest products. These practices distort markets for forest products, lead to global overcapacity and put increased pressure on forest resources. AF&PA looks for opportunities to achieve subsidies discipline in bilateral and multilateral negotiations and work with our partners in the global forest products industry to ensure that global markets for forest and paper products are open, fair and competitive.
AF&PA encourages the U.S. administration to use existing international monetary and trade rules or, where necessary, strengthen international rules against currency manipulation by other countries. If necessary, Congress should pass responsible legislation that is compatible with the rules of the World Trade Organization.